August 01, 2005
#2 is definately MEGUMI
I'd like IDs on the rest of them.
Posted by: JeanPaul at August 2, 2005 12:36 AM10: Wakatsuki Chinatsu
Posted by: Blackcracker at August 2, 2005 02:13 AMiiK! nr3 is like super cute deluxe
Posted by: BKNEC at August 2, 2005 02:18 AMomg! yet another awesome collection!
Posted by: drifter at August 2, 2005 06:05 AM#2 MEGUMI
#5 Takeuchi Nozomi
#6 Takizawa Nonami
I know #1, but I can't place the name at the moment...
Posted by: Zato Ichi at August 2, 2005 10:00 AMCheck it out
Posted by: Mike at August 2, 2005 12:56 PMWho is #3,8 and 9, Please.
#7 Kuku Rukuko
#8 Kadyot Lang
#10 Tina Ryan
Siguro kase...
Posted by: danggit bai at August 2, 2005 02:11 PMoops (*^-^*) I mean #4! mind you...
Posted by: debido at August 2, 2005 06:23 PMrubbish @ danggit bai.
#7, #8, #10 are none that you've id-ed.
#8 IS MAIKO OSAWA!!!!!!
Posted by: hibiki13 at August 3, 2005 01:48 AMSigh... who is number 1!?!?!?
Posted by: JeanPaul at August 3, 2005 06:02 AMomg mike, you da man, HITOMI AND MIYABI VCDS FOR ONLY 99CENTS? DAYUM!
http://stores.ebay.com/Shirouto-Teien
Posted by: asianlova at August 3, 2005 10:06 AMyeah, who the heck is #1??? She's obviously the hottest of all!!
Posted by: zopop at August 3, 2005 01:58 PM#1 is Risa Shimamoto.
Posted by: Giorgio at August 3, 2005 02:01 PMJust a survey for anyone who visits... Most of you are here because you appreciate Japanese women in some form another, at least physically. Here's a question for everybody- does anyone here prefer a more firm, toned, and developed body? I ask because there's a big difference between most casual to serious japanese models training regiment and diet compared to western standards... Most japanese models diet modestly, but don't have a serious (if any at all) training regiment. There bodies are just what they are (usually soft and squishy). Even those famous panty shots that Japan is so fond of, is a visual technique done by pulling back any "loose panty cloth" in the backside (so it can't be seen in the photograph) and clipped so that the viewer sees eye popping camel. Most of their curves are exaggerated by camera angles and poses- and without them the girls actually do not have shapely, firm sculpted butts, lower bach arches, or shapely thighs. My main point- visual stimuli aside, has everyone considered this? My exgirlfriend (korean/japanese) had a body very similar to most of these girls (sans the giant D cupsize), and while still entertaining- I couldn't help wishing at times that her butt was more firm, or her thighs weren't so squishy when I grabbed them. She wasn't out of shape- she only weighed 105 at 5'4'' and wore a size 1. To the eye, she would be shapely- but when you grab it- mushy. Very different when you compare bodies with a girl who actually tries to train her body a little.
Posted by: daftenglish at August 3, 2005 05:17 PMIt's that softness and mushiness that makes me want these women. I don't care for a toned body if it feels like rock.
Posted by: BlackCracker at August 4, 2005 04:42 AMhmmm...you are quite right there about a body that feels like a rock
Posted by: aza_akira at August 4, 2005 09:46 AMcould u hump a rock? im not so sure if that would be pleasnt
Posted by: MTL at August 4, 2005 05:22 PMsoft n squishy :D
Posted by: miszt at August 5, 2005 06:46 AMHi everyone i would just like to say that i'm gay so please email me and take the piss.
thanks
Miyabi youre so sexy and cute......i like u.....
Posted by: bonny at August 31, 2005 11:51 PM
